Deadline: 15 September 2017
\nCall for entries<\/p>\n
Open call for wrong works: Scripting the Other<\/p>\n
SCRIPTING THE OTHER is a pavilion (online exhibition) in the third
\nedition of The Wrong – New Digital Art Biennale (Nov 1, 2017 – Jan 31,
\n2018).<\/p>\n
We’re calling for works that explore the notions of the Other and
\nOtherness in online, performative scripting and writing. The work should
\npreferably have some live, dynamic function – e.g. through (ambivalent)
\ninteraction with user\/audience, communicating, streaming, mashing
\ntextual-visual sources and feeds, live coding,
\nstream-of-consciousness-or-data writing or scripting.<\/p>\n
The idea is to use internet as an instrument of the Other, and
\nantitheses to the echochamber of the self, and set up an interface
\ntowards it, as if communicating with or observing an undefined, unknown
\nor uknowable entity, operating system, or AI. The exhibition examines
\ntext and text-visuals in meeting with an inordinant ‘Here Comes
\nEverything’, the role and protocol of author, reader – entangled and
\nundermined.<\/p>\n
If possible, the exhibition will take form as an embodiment of the Other
\nwith the works selected being incorporated within it.<\/p>\n
Works for the exhibition should be made for web browsers.<\/p>\n
Deadline: 15. September 2017 Scripting the Other is part of the project Other Writing initiated by Notes<\/p>\n ‘Live coding’ meaning programmable live and that the writing process is ‘Ambivalent interaction’: To challenge and undermine ideas about ‘The Other’ as a writing process, and the category ‘Scripting the Other’ SCRIPTING THE OTHER will explore through such a hybrid reading-writing A “nihilogue” (e-lit term introduced by Espen Aarseth, 1997) – a text The reader\/audience might interact with the script, either in plain text The scripting might serve as communication between transmitter and The scripting might have a relatively pure and transparent interface, a Links Deadline: 15 September 2017 Call for entries Open call for wrong works: Scripting the Other SCRIPTING THE OTHER is a pavilion (online exhibition) in the third edition of The Wrong […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8252,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,21,103,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-calls-general","category-digital","category-digital-culture","category-electronic-art","has_thumb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8251"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8251\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8253,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8251\/revisions\/8253"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/8252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netex.nmartproject.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nContact: mail@noemata.net<\/a><\/p>\n
\nNoemata and funded by Arts Council Norway. Noemata is a production site
\nfor digital and netbased art affiliated with PNEK (production network
\nfor electronic art Norway).<\/p>\n
\nmade visible and part of the execution, or put in another way, that it
\nincludes a visible operational meta-level where the text is
\ncoded\/generated.<\/p>\n
\ncommunication, meaningfulness, identity, noise\/signal, writer, reader,
\nand the like, in relation to text. For example, the audience\/browser
\nshould ask questions about what this text _is_ – is it communication? do
\nI write? who’s writing? do I read? both? – and at least to conclude that
\nthe text has its proper life and symbolically approaches the Other (the
\nopposite to self and identity). Ambivalent interaction is a metaphor for
\nthe way we operate on the internet – how internet opens up for a game of
\nidentity, partly necessitated in the face of an overwhelming and
\nfrenzied ‘other’, something which in turn has created a feverish market
\nfor simulacra, representation and imitation – think of social media
\nacting as a ‘big data’ simulacrum, and ‘selfies’ acting as a kind of
\nmockery mirror. In reality, this kind of identity has an equivalent
\nvast, dark side, ‘other’, as a reaction, since our default state on the
\ninternet is both anonymous and transparent (two antitheses of identity).<\/p>\n
\nas an aggregate term for text or text-visuals not immediately
\ncategorizable: “The concept that the Self requires the existence of the
\nOther … Lacan associated the Other with the symbolic order and
\nlanguage. Levinas connected it with the scriptural and traditional God,
\nin The Infinite Other. … Ethically, for Levinas, the “Other” is
\nsuperior or prior to the self; the mere presence of the Other makes
\ndemands before one can respond … Levinas talks of the Other in terms
\nof ‘insomnia’ and ‘wakefulness’. It is an ecstasy, or exteriority toward
\nthe Other that forever remains beyond any attempt at full capture, this
\notherness is interminable (or infinite)… it has not been negated or
\ncontrolled. … The “Other”, as a general term in philosophy, can also
\nbe used to mean the unconscious, silence, insanity, the other of
\nlanguage (i.e., what it refers to and what is unsaid), etc.” —
\nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Other<\/a><\/p>\n
\nprocess an integration to a wider operational identity, perhaps with a
\nreference to analytical psychology and its individuation process if we
\nlook at the unconscious as ‘the Other’ and internet again as the
\nunconscious through big data which we are interacting ambivalently with.
\nIf we associate ‘the Other’ with the symbolic order and language, and
\nassume that the unconscious has a language, we can treat the internet
\nwith its endless stream of data as a stream-of-(un)consciousness and
\n‘Other’ in the meeting with the browser, identity and traditional reader
\nand writer.<\/p>\n
\nwhich has neither origin or impact (author or audience), for everyone
\nand for no one, in the sense that it is automatic or unconscious, and
\ncorresponds approaching the ‘the Other’, an existence evading control,
\nand in a stream which is continuously and increasingly diverging; can be
\ncompared with a ‘default state network’ in the brain, whirring
\nconstantly, a dream without a dreamer.<\/p>\n
\nor commands, and the script will process the input and respond in
\ndifferent manner similar to the role as ‘other’\/unknown\/internet; that
\nthe input for instance can be filtered through social networking,
\nsearch, databases, algorithms, providing ‘resonant’ answers, i.e. the
\nanswer is a kind of reverberation of the situation where the context
\nplays part and changes (as is often the case on the internet –
\neverything is context, everything is protocol).<\/p>\n
\nreceiver, where the aspect of ‘Other’ is put in the background and
\nintervens more sporadically. These modes can be compared with the Other
\nas ‘insomnia’, ‘wakefulness’, ‘ecstasy’, ‘presence’.<\/p>\n
\nwriting surface, in the meeting between the transmitter and
\ncomputer\/internet\/recipient, where these different roles avoid defining.
\nAs mentioned the writing surface can provide a sort of resonance space
\nbetween identity and ‘other’, as the scripting uses the input to process
\ntextual mass from the net, and thereby intervening in the writing
\nprocess which might reveal an associative-resonant meaning. The
\nscripting can itself start this process and the user act as a resonant
\nsearch machine for it.<\/p>\n
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/thewrong3\/<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thewrongbiennale\/<\/a>
\nhttp:\/\/noemata.net\/<\/a>
\nhttps:\/\/www.facebook.com\/noemata.net\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"